Rothwell, J. Dan. 1995. In Mixed Company: Small Group Communication. 2nd ed. Orlando: Hartcourt Brace College.
oral:_small_group
Lumsden, Gay, and Donald Lumsden
Lumsden, Gay, and Donald Lumsden. 2000. Communicating in Groups and Teams: Sharing Leadership. 3rd ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Kell, Carl L., and Paul R. Corts
Keywords:
Kell, Carl L., and Paul R. Corts. 1980. Fundamentals of Effective Group Communication. New York: MacMillan Co., Inc.
Beebe, Steven A., and John T. Masterson
Keywords:
Beebe, Steven A., and John T. Masterson. 2000. Communicating in Small Groups: Principles and Practices. 6th ed. New York: Longman.
Oral Presentation Rubric - Scaled Evaluation
Oral Presentation Rubric Using a Scaled Evaluation
Name __________________________________________
Group _________________________________________
Group _________________________________________
Content
1. Material
2. Organization with transition
to next speaker
3. Audience engagement
Peer Evaluation Sheet for Oral Presentations
Suggestion for Oral Presentation Peer Evaluation sheet
For more information on this Peer Critique Evaluation, read a summary of pros and cons of this method.
Holistic Grading Overview for Oral Presentations
Holistic Criteria Used for Evaluating Speeches
For more information on this Holistic Grading Approach, read a summary of pros and cons of this method.
The Informative Speech Feedback Form offers an example of the following holistic grading approach.
Speech Evaluation Criteria
Criteria for Evaluating Informative and Persuasive Speeches
For more information on this Modified Point System Grading, read a summary of pros and cons of this method.
The following rubric for assessing speeches is based on a 100-point scale. To translate to letter grades for subsections, use the following table as a guide.
10 points
9 = A
Oral Presentation Evaluation - Small Groups
Small Group Oral Presentations Evaluation
For more information on this Modified Point System Grading, read a summary of pros and cons of this method.
Introduction (20 Points)
- Captured attention in opener
- Introduced group members
- Background information (including importance of topic)
- Introduced “topic” and content to follow (preview)
- Effective transition into body
- Effective delivery
Body (30 Points)
Oral Presentation Evaluation - Teams
Team Evaluation Form
For more information on this Point System Grading, read a summary of pros and cons of this method.