Reynolds, Nedra, Patricia Bizzell, and Bruce Herzberg. 2004. The Bedford Bibliography for Teachers of Writing. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s.
bibliography
Communication Assessment Rubrics
Resources for Assessing Communication Activities
Types of Rubrics
Analytic Rubrics
ePortfolio Resources
- http://donpayne.public.iastate.edu/105H/home/tabfour2.html
- http://www.w3schools.com/css/
Portfolio Bibliography
WOVE Research
eds. New Worlds, New Words: Exploring Pathways for Writing About and In Electronic Environments. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press. 2001.
Multiliteracies. London: Routledge, 2000.
eds. New Media: Theories and Practices of Digitextuality. NY: Routledge. 2003.
Electronic Communication
"Distant Voices: Teaching and Writing in a Culture of Technology." College English 61.3 (1999): 261–80.
"Multimedia Copyright Laws and Guidelines: Take the Test." Business Communication Quarterly 61.4 (1998): 32–39.
Alphabet to Email: How Written English Evolved and Where It's Heading. New York: Routledge, 2000.
Visual Communication Assessment
“Visual Rhetoric.” Southern Illinois University-Carbondale. http://www.sla.purdue.edu/people/engl/dblakesley/visual/.
"Introduction: Notes on Visual Rhetoric." Enculturation. Vol. 3, No. 2, Fall 2001. http://enculturation.gmu.edu/3_2/introduction.html.
Visual Communication Pedagogy
“Syntactic Theory of Visual Communication, Part One.” 1996. http://commfaculty.fullerton.edu/lester/writings/viscomtheory.html
“Visual Communication as a Primary System.” Journal of Visual Literacy 14:2 (1994): 11–21. http://spot.colorado.edu/~moriarts/primelang.html
Visual Communication History and Theory
"'Great Divide' Theories, Phonocentrism, Graphocentrism & Logocentrism." http://www.aber.ac.uk/media/Documents/litoral/litoral1.html
General Visual Communication
“Material Literacy and Visual Design.” Rhetorical Bodies. Ed. Jack Selzer and Sharon Crowley. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1999. 171-201.
“From Analysis to Teaching: Visual Communication in the Teaching of Writing.” College Composition and Communication 54.1 (2002): 11–39.